Wikia

Pokémon Wiki

Changes: Forum:Support Votes

Edit

Back to page

(Votes for Three)
m (Setting forums up to be archived., removed: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}})
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
+
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
   
 
Because of the fact that we no longer have a lot of users, I think that the "+6 votes to be promoted" no longer applies. I think we should change it to +4 at the most, more likely +3. Because of the currently high amount of votes needed, Slaying is having to base whether or not he promotes somebody, not on the scoring system but on the fact that the user has no oppose. <span style="border:3px solid olive; -moz-border-radius: 2em 1em 1em 0em; -webkit-border-radius: 2em 1em 1em 0em; border-radius: 2em 1em 1em 0em;">[[User:Rainbow Shifter|Rainbow Shifter]]</span> 17:23, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
Because of the fact that we no longer have a lot of users, I think that the "+6 votes to be promoted" no longer applies. I think we should change it to +4 at the most, more likely +3. Because of the currently high amount of votes needed, Slaying is having to base whether or not he promotes somebody, not on the scoring system but on the fact that the user has no oppose. <span style="border:3px solid olive; -moz-border-radius: 2em 1em 1em 0em; -webkit-border-radius: 2em 1em 1em 0em; border-radius: 2em 1em 1em 0em;">[[User:Rainbow Shifter|Rainbow Shifter]]</span> 17:23, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
Line 15: Line 15:
   
 
===Votes for Four===
 
===Votes for Four===
  +
[[Category:Archived Forums]]

Revision as of 19:09, May 27, 2013


Because of the fact that we no longer have a lot of users, I think that the "+6 votes to be promoted" no longer applies. I think we should change it to +4 at the most, more likely +3. Because of the currently high amount of votes needed, Slaying is having to base whether or not he promotes somebody, not on the scoring system but on the fact that the user has no oppose. Rainbow Shifter 17:23, January 22, 2013 (UTC)

Not sure whether my opinion counts (I've been here less than a month, but have over 400 edits if you count my abandoned account + this, whether you value my opinion is down to you) but I noticed we have a small continuous editing community now (again I haven't been here long, sorry if any of my assumptions are inaccurate) and I would say it's better off to lower the voting boundaries in order for something to pass, given the small amount of regular editors we have here now. User:Cannk/sig 17:27, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
I agree, and you are correct, Ozank.   Slayingthehalcyon   (Talk)  17:31,1/22/2013    4,178  
Drop it down to four or three. With the fact that not many people are aware of the pages existing, it should be dropped down. – EnemyPeacemaker 22:44, January 22, 2013 (UTC)

Votes

Just a signature will do.   Slayingthehalcyon   (Talk)  01:31,1/23/2013    4,178  

Votes for Three

Votes for Four

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki