m (Setting forums up to be archived.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category:Request Booth|{{PAGENAME}}]]__NEWSECTIONLINK__ |
||
| − | <div class="forumheader" style="margin-bottom: 1em">'''Forums:''' [[Forum:Index|Index]] '''→''' [[Forum:Request Booth|Request Booth]] '''→''' {{PAGENAME}}</div> |
||
| − | |||
Okay, so basically, I had brought the discussion up on Zeldapedia and I was wondering if it'd be good to work here. We'd get a little crew together and we'd work on a '''single''' walkthrough at a time. This way, we'd have better grammar included and better spelling, as well as more accurate information. Instead of the walkthrouhghs being subpages to the article in the namespace, it'd be a new namespace titled Walkthrough: |
Okay, so basically, I had brought the discussion up on Zeldapedia and I was wondering if it'd be good to work here. We'd get a little crew together and we'd work on a '''single''' walkthrough at a time. This way, we'd have better grammar included and better spelling, as well as more accurate information. Instead of the walkthrouhghs being subpages to the article in the namespace, it'd be a new namespace titled Walkthrough: |
||
| Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
:I'm thinking that the format should be something like "Walkthrough: Pokémon (game version)/Part #". Any modifications in mind, or do you guys have a completely different idea? {{User:ChaosVoid/Sig2|04:02,4/14/2012}} |
:I'm thinking that the format should be something like "Walkthrough: Pokémon (game version)/Part #". Any modifications in mind, or do you guys have a completely different idea? {{User:ChaosVoid/Sig2|04:02,4/14/2012}} |
||
| + | [[Category:Archived Forums]] |
||
Latest revision as of 19:21, 27 May 2013
Okay, so basically, I had brought the discussion up on Zeldapedia and I was wondering if it'd be good to work here. We'd get a little crew together and we'd work on a single walkthrough at a time. This way, we'd have better grammar included and better spelling, as well as more accurate information. Instead of the walkthrouhghs being subpages to the article in the namespace, it'd be a new namespace titled Walkthrough:
What do you guys think? Jäzzi 02:35, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
Discussion
Support: Sure. I realized that it would be difficult for people to find walkthroughs if they were subpages, so a new namespace would make sense. — ChaosVoid 07:50,4/12/2012
Support: Sounds like a neat way to gain viewers of the wiki. — Wattz2000 20:49, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
- Update
Since we're only missing one of our consistent userbase, I'm going to go ahead and send in the special contact email. – Jazzi 22:10, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
- Update II
The namespace is up. We can start sorting out how the walkthroughs will run and how they'll be set up and everything. Jäzzi 03:19, April 14, 2012 (UTC)